Quote:

ManofTheAtom said:
Mxy, I already told you this once before.

NO one forces writers to follow continuity, that's THEIR choice.

Someone like Cooke took the choice that Levitz gave him to set his story outside continuity once it proved that there was no room in continuity fot it.

This made Cooke EXTREMELY happy and he went on with his story.

But once a writer CHOOSES to tell a story in continuity, there are RULES that have to be followed.



Okay, okay, I can buy that. But... what if a writer wants to make an out of continuity story in the main books? Can he do it or is that a sin?
Quote:

Same goes for writers.

If they want to work IN continuity, then they have to follow the rules...



So, the works that don't respect continuity are outside of it. If there's a run that lasts three years and it doesn't respect continuity, you may ignore it. You're free to do so.

Quote:

Some writers are just damn whinners.



And you're not? No, seriously, don't you consider what you do whinning? Sure, it's for a different reason... but it's still whinning. I'm whinning too, to an extent. You whine in monumental scales. How can you complain about someone whinning when you're doing the same thing, and worst? Because you think you're right? Guess what; everyone thinks they're right. Me included. Waid included.