Quote: Dave said: Well, I can relate to that emotion.
Quote: britneyspearsatemyshorts said: i think with the 9-11 it showed that the terrorist had a capability and will to do major attacks, im assuming that since they have been few and far between the war on terror is working, i do not believe that they suddenly decided they went to far and decided to tone down the attacks......
Yeah, which is kind of what I mean by limited success. We've had Bali and now Madrid since 9/11. At least we haven't also had Washington, London and Moscow, I suppose.
Probably the best thing the Bush administration has done by far in the war on terror is invade Afghanistan and kick the Taliban into the hills.
But still, it hasn't stopped.
well no, but then i dont think the world has the stomach for what it would take to wipe them out completely. as it stands i think Bush has done as much as anyone can do. We've had presidents in the past whose only response to terror was to lob cruise missles at tents, at least Bush has been comprehensive sending troops, rallying the world to attempt to block their finances and continuing to pressure those who want to set the fence to join in. It's not perfect but short of us going into every suspected hideout across international borders its the best that can be done....
