Quote:

sneaky bunny said:
Quote:

thedoctor said:
Nice 180 there. It can't learn or understand; but it can suffer, huh?


excuse me, doc, sweety, boby, baby, I'm all for pulling the plug and the whole DNR thing.



I just had to mention the whole flip-flop from an unborn baby just being a mass of cells to you not wanting one to "suffer". The fact that you consider it able to suffer hurts your arguement that it is unable to "love and understand".


Quote:

winged creature said:
m talking about the fetus in the mothers womb, that cannot survive without the mother. If it cannot survive on its own then it is not a person just an underveloped sac of cells.



It also cannot function without its mother after birth. Does that mean that it is still unable to be a functioning person?

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."