You say Clinton is "adverse to doing things the legal way", but you expect him to arrest Osama Bin Laden for crimes he hasn't yet committed? If this was from '96, then it was before the bombings of American embassies in Africa or the USS Cole(not to mention the obvious 9/11 attacks).
Clinton did get the Sudanese government to expel Bin Laden. Without clear evidence of involvement in terrorist activies, what could Clinton have done legally?
