Quote: r3x29yz4a said: You have to remember that the right wingers and neocons that run Fox news...Fox news is well known for its bias
No, Raymond. You consider Fox biased. Not only has that not been established but, as noted on other threads, studies have shown Fox is not biased.
Furthermore, Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch and the Clintons work together on the "Clinton Global Initiative," and Murdoch has hosted Clinton fundraisers.
Here's that "mean old Chris Wallace," at one of them.
So try a different tack. It didn't work for Bill when he lost his temper this weekend and it doesn't work for you now.
Quote: r3x29yz4a said: the reporter was being hostile towards him and Clinton lost his cool....I think he has the right to be a little annoyed when the interviewer essentially attacked him.
You're either delusional or a deliberate liar. Clinton was asked the same type of question in the same type of manner that politicians are asked questions on a daily basis. It has already been established that Wallace has asked similar questions of Donald Rumsfeld. Therefore, you either need to call Wallace's questioning of Rumsfeld "an attack" too, or recognize that you are being inaccurate, hypocritical, or both.
As noted above, the only reason it would seem like an attack to Clinton is that he is normally excused from this sort of treatment.
Quote: the G-man said: Years of ... sycophantic treatment left Clinton unable to answer the sort of question that Republican politicians have to face all the time.
