RKMBs Forums .::Robegories::. Sports and Wrestling little natech?

no... not that little natech...

saw a replay of the undertaker/ric flair wrestlemania match... was that "little natech" as the ref??

You mean Charles Robinson? (and it should be spelled 'naitch') I didn't see the match, but it probably was. He was one of the refs brought in to try to legitimize the Invasion angle, although he's been working as a WWF ref since with nary an explanation.

Not to get off subject, but are refs affected by the roster split?

i dunno.

and i dont understand why there'd be wwf refs or wcw refs. ... makes'em sound bias (which, by default, they shouldnt be).

i do think it was him, tho -- spelling be damned!

It was him.

...yeah that was Charles Robinson.....

WOOO!
(wooo!)

The WCW refs were supposed to be biased. Like I said, they thought it'd legitimize the angle, plus add a new heelish aspect that WCW would have an advantage with their crooked refs. Since I'm one of the losers who pays attention to that sort of thing, I noticed that Charles Robinson NEVER counted a single win for his side, even though JR would literally be SCREAMING about how he was a partial ref. Somehow, the Blunder Twins never noticed this so he continued to count wins for Da Rock, as well as even DQ Booker on one occasion when he faced Tajiri. Makes you wonder how seriously you're supposed to take the announcers, y'know...

Okay, enough of this tangent, move along now.

you watch wrestling!!

loser!