The difference is that Bush continues to stick with his cahnge of ideas. He saw there was a need for Homeland Security, he pushed for the creation of one. Kerry changes his views from person to person, so to give them just what the people want to hear. For example...
While with a group of Palestinians, Kerry was against the fence in Israel. But when he is with a group of Jews, he says the fence is vital for Israel protection.
Kerry wants to look like this decorated war hero to get that moderate vote, yet wants to be seen as someone who also forsaken his role that got him this decoration.
Kerry wants to be seen as voting for something then voting against it later.
Etc, etc, etc...
This is said by Kerry within the last 6 months, some statements just a few weeks apart. As if he doesn't realize there are satelites orbiting the Planet Houston that delivers this information about him instantly.
To change your mind is one thing, but just give people what they want to hear is another. Furthermore, 9/11 is a good enough reason for ZOD to think someone would change their views on Homeland Security and role within the world. There is a reason for Bush's actions.
KNEEL before ZOD!
