Maybe because that way they would be dependant from the private founders?
And that while governement depends from the electors, and could be changed by elections, private multinational corporations don't respond to anything?
Said that (with a jokingly, light tone - must I specify?), I confirm that I prefer if the founding come from people that the Vanguardians trusts (Sam, Griss, Euro itself) than from the island governement.
But that would be a step further toward something different from the current situation, Sammitch: up to today, at last theoretically, Vanguard is a company whose actions should be directed to make money. With the new direction, they would be an organization which is founded to do "good deeds" on its complete autonomy.
But I am sure no one would notice the difference, because basically that's what we have ever done, with a few exceptions. We would just recognize what the collective writing has wanted for the team.
It's just semantic.
