No one here but you brought up the alleged "Betrayal of Yalta."
My point, clearly noted above, was that Doc's photo demonstrated that an administration may be allied with, and photographed with, a world figure who later is revealed to be villainous. This, however, as noted above, does not justify that administration, or subsequent administrations, turning a blind eye to later villainry.
Nor does it, per se, "prove" said administration was complicit in that villainry.
Similar points were also made regarding the Clinton and Carter photos.
Instead of discussing connections we haven't made, any comment on the growing body of evidence of connections between Saddam and Al Quaeda?
