Quote:

Animalman said:
I think you're taking what I'm saying a bit too literally. Designed truths are different. Statistical truths, legal truths, those are just labels, representations created specifically to have one pre-conceived "answer".

Relatively speaking, they don't apply. Legal guilt or innocence have a previously constructed set of criteria. Real world innonence or guilt is based entirely on subjective interpretation.



What if it's not?

I'm not taking what you're saying to litereraly, I'm simply expressing my belifs in litereal terms wich is there is absolute truth, but not perfect interpritation.

Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k