Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
I see it as helping Clinton get votes from middle America. My opinion is that most people are sympathetic to Sheehan but wouldn't want her setting policy. So having Sheehan attack Clinton is a plus in my book. Also I think it's unlikely that Republicans will get to enjoy being a unified party like the last election themselves.



So, is Hillary opposes Sheehan it's clever way to "get votes from Middle America," and "a plus in [your] book." But when conservatives oppose Sheehan they're engaging in a "deceitful smear camapaign" against a "grieving mother"?


I think your neglecting what I constitute as an attack. There is a difference between attacking someone & dissagreeing with them. My full quote that you edited says
Quote:

Opinions are fine but deceitful smear campaigns are another matter.



Considering that I'm pointing out that opinions are fine, what exactly do you see where I'm treating Cons differently than Libs?

Fair play!