|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,251
6000+ posts
|
|
6000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,251 |
Quote:
TK-069 said:
OK, since I don't really like politics at all, I have to ask this question:
Do you support the person's ideals for your respective party, or are you just supporting them because they're associated with your party?
Both in a way, because parties are formed based on ideals. I support a canidate based on how well he/she represents the ideals of the party.
Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma.
" I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9
JLA brand RACK points = 514k 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,202 Likes: 80
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
|
|
Fair Play! 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,202 Likes: 80 |
Quote:
wannabuyamonkey said:
Quote:
Matter-eater Man said:
Quote:
wannabuyamonkey said:
And it looks like yo're not above stretching credulity for a good one liner either.
Since I backed up what I said with Cheney quotes I'm curious where any stretching on my part occurred. Please explain.
Because you made it sound as though Cheney said those things durring the debate in spite of the recent evidence, Besides you took his quotes out of context. He was wrong about the Atta thing, I guess, but his other statements aren't contrary to anything else that's been said.
It was Edwards that brought up Cheney connecting 9/11 to Saddam during the debate. I provided the whole paragraph surrounding the quote plus a link to where I got it. I just don't see the context changing. And he just flat out denied saying what he had said about the Atta thing. (the lier!) Cheney just doesn't have enough credability to be throwing them rocks at Edwards IMHO.
Fair play!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
