Gee, what a surprise, I take the time to respond with polite answers, and you respond with more snide remarks, mockery and condescension:

Quote:

Wednesday said:
Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
Well, Wednesday, I see you've been making bitter personal assumptions about my person and character, in four lengthy posts while I was away from the boards.


Of course!



A sample of that mockery I was talking about.
So much for the slightest appreciation for me giving you a thoughtful and serious answer.

Quote:

Wednesday said:

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
Many of the issues you raise have been answered in many other topics where similar bitter attacks, and assumptions about my alleged "anger" and "hate" of all liberals, despite how many times I've made clear as I did just a few posts ago on page 3 of this very topic, that there are many Democrats in the Senate and Congress that I respect as civil and respectfully offering constructive criticism of the Republican policies.
Ans as I've said also, many times, there are MANY liberals here on the boards ( Chant, JQ, Franta, etc. ) who I have no hostile interaction with, because they don't launch the snottiness and personal attacks on me that a certain 6 or 7 liberal assholes do here.


I've honestly looked on pages 2, 3, and 4 of this topic to find your comment about Democrats in Congress, but I can't. I must not be looking hard enough. Could you please quote it?



No. based on your wasting this much of my time, and being a jerk about it besides, look for it yourself.

Quote:

Wednesday said:

You have very limited dealings with both Chant and Franta. Also, Chant does not count himself as a liberal, and I don't remember Franta ever saying that he was either. JQ is another story. To my knowledge your interactions with JQ mirror your interactions with me, but I don't remember any specific ones so I'll give it to you.



You don't know as much as you think you do. I've exchanged at least 100 posts with Chant, across "It's not about oil or Iraq" and other topics.

While to some JQ might be virtually identical to Whomod, I see a lot more of a serious quest for answers in JQ, despite that I disagree with his views. Again, you're dead wrong about the interaction between JQ and me. The harshest post I've ever given JQ was in his Dave the Wonder Boy LIED! topic (linked above), where I come right out and say that despit his liberal views I generally respect his posts, and was disturbed by his recent trend toward more Whomod-like antagonistic posting.

Franta I don't deal as much with, maybe 30 or 40 posts in the recent past, but Franta has a good sense of humor, and I recognize his jokes toward me as jokes, rather than the usual veiled attacks cloaked as "humor" by several others here.

Quote:

Wednesday said:

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
More specific to you, Wednesday, I would like to respond politely, but I'm not even sure I should bother responding to you, based on your comments to this and several other topics:

Ronald Reagan Dies
http://www.rkmbs.com/...=16&fpart=6

You solicit long intelligent well-thought-out answers, and then say you can't be bothered to read them.

And you'll notice in the Reagan topic, as in many other topics, that I was trying very hard to be polite, until I was baited and baited and baited until I finally responded to liberal snottiness.


I'm amazed that you brought up that thread. Isn't that where you called me a raging troll asshole?



Yes I did, and appropriately so. As I noted toward the end, you later became more conciliatory, and I responded in kind when you did.


Quote:

Wednesday said:
Also of note:

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
I find that hard to believe, considering the relentless
antagonism you provide here in response to virtually every
topic I post to.

I'm a pretty forgiving guy, but I don't treat people who
constantly misrepresent me and constantly launch personal
atrtacks on me like they're my friends.



Please post examples of this relentless antagonism. If you mean that I disagree with you, then you're basically faulting me for posting my own opinions to the same topics to which you post your opinions. If I've posted relentless antagonisms toward you, specifically, then let me know.
.
And you responded:
.
Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
Basically, I think you meant your post to be more mutually critical of sniping from both the Left and the Right here on the boards, and through either your writing or my perception, it came across more left-favoring than you wanted it to be.
And I think the further into it, the more balanced your criticism got. My apologies for remaining in defense mode while you were being conciliatory.
.
.
Just a general expression of unleashed emotion on a board where nothing can be deleted.
Which I think tends to happen more when two people discuss their opinionated opinions, instead of shared facts. Which is why I tend to post long. Effectively or not, I try to lay out the facts as I understand them. But again, I see your point about brevity, and I'll work on it.



I said we were both being misconstrued. Then you called my offer to buy you beer kind and said you appreciated it.

Those quotes are from page 6 of that thread.



As I said, I don't look for flame wars, and ignore as much as I can (about 50% of the time, I see the insults and snide remarks, and don't respond). When you flamed me, I felt obligated to respond. When your tone became conciliatory, I likewise welcomed the chance to do the same.





Quote:

Wednesday said:

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
If you go back to page 2 of this topic where I first posted...
And then read both yours and Animalman's initial responses, I see my initial post as, without rancor, offering a factual correction to a false notion you asserted about McCarthyism feuling the "In God We Trust" on paper currency, which I politely corrected.
And yours and Animalman's responses to my post were each a full-scale, thermonuclear, deeply personal and angry response to what I initially posted, that solicited an obligatory lengthy response from me. And then Steve T and Disco Steve chimed in.
And even so, I labored to stay on topic and not get personal except for responding to the personal attacks on me.

Far from my alleged "hate", it is clear in your responses that you guys HATE ME, and lash out every time I post to the DEEP THOUGHTS forum.


Your first sentence in this thread was the oft-quoted:

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
I get really sick of reading liberal rationalizations based on historical "facts" that are so buttfucking wrong !





I guess you're portraying "buttfucking wrong" as the ultimate insult to your mother or something. I already said, several times here that it was just a goofy-sounding phrase, as harmless a phrase as saying "that's WHACK!"

Quote:

Wednesday said:

Second, no false notion was ever asserted. You've assigned meaning to something that never had any.

The reason people chimed in was because you were ignoring the fact that I said paper money which is not all currency.



The reason they chimed in is because they're liberal partisans trying to harass me.

I already explained that "In God We Trust" was on coins for 89 years before it was added to paper currency in 1957, and that this was part of a larger trend toward more recognition of our Christian heritage that began with the end of the Civil War in 1866 (as I said, as my twice-repeated links said) and resulted in Christian heritage additions to government institutions over many decades, independent of McCarthyism.

Quote:

Wednesday said:

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
Geez, what an insulting notion. I challenge you to find 10 of your own. But as I said on page 2 of this topic, you are civil as often as you are snotty. Would that you held yourself to the same standard. And I would add that I don't bait and bait with personal attacks to the point that I force them to respond, as you, Animalman and others do.

Here are 10. And there are certainly plenty more:

Bush's Speech 9-3 (Democrat Bush bashing)
HERE

The Sex Txt Teacher 9-7 (teacher pedophilia, Mary kay Letorneau)
HERE

Dave the Wonder Boy LIED! 8-16
http://www.rkmbs.com/...e=9&fpart=1

Supreme Court Preserves 'God' in Pledge 6-13 to 8-22
http://www.rkmbs.com/...=11&fpart=2

Ronstadt Booed for Supporting Michael Moore 7-20-04
http://www.rkmbs.com/...=12&fpart=1


I'll wait for the full list of ten.


Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
This one, as well as the Ronald Reagan Dies topic (above), are examples where examples where I did my level best to be polite while others made bitter personal insults toward me:
Coalition forces torture Iraqi prisoners 5-1 to 7-21
http://www.rkmbs.com/...=13&fpart=1


See my points above about that topic. I think anything else I say will be viewed as snotty.



An ambiguous remark, from which I can determine neither your sincerity or your sarcasm, whichever was intended.