Quote:

Pariah said:
Quote:

I'm Not Mister Mxypltk said:
I made a simple question. Does that a lot constitute a big enough percentage to make a considerable difference? I don't think so. Using condoms is not technically just as good as abstinence, but practically it is.



Mxy, don't be the ignorant slut you love to dress yourself up to be. What do you think you're closer to when you're having sex as opposed to not having sex? In which situation do you think those 90 some percent chances will start to waver?

Quote:

The only big difference is that one "offends God" and the other doesn't, which is your real motivation.



Get off your high horse already. You act like I think AIDS is a convenient excuse for me to peddle my beliefs, and its not........It's a convenient excuse for me to say, "I told ya so!" to stubborn fuckwits.

Anywho, we've been over this before. Just because I started off on this 'no sex' tangent cuz' of God, doesn't mean I stay with it solely cuz' of Him--And that sure as hell doesn't suddenly invalidate my other arguments.



Calm down man, I admit I was wrong about the safety of condoms themselves... I had the wrong idea and I admit it.

But what about having a stable sex partner, one you can really trust to be clean from any STDs? What would be your basis for being against that as I'm assuming you are?

Or, let's put it this way, what if an anti-conceptive 100% effective was invented... would you still be against it, and why?