Yes the book is that old, but sheesh, how many different arguments do you want to have at once? I started an entire thread on the validity of scriptures some time ago and you didn't choose to open that diolouge then so don't try to derail this topic. You may place an experation date on truth, but I think theres something to be said about a book that has whithstood the test of two millenia. If you want to debate that dig up the old thread.
I simply replied to what you said in this thread. I don't have threads memorized or indexed so that I can be sure I'm responding in the correct spot.
Sheesh. It's not thread derailing. It was a remark. If you thought it was bullshit or placed inappropriately, don't respond to it.
No I just thought it was jumping topics, nothing more. I mean if I respond and defend the validity of scripture then you'll jump to something else. I'm just trying to stay focused (somewhat). If you want to discuss the validity of scripture, we can do that, but in it's time. I mean people on both sides write volumes on each topip so I'm not going to try to deal with all of them at once. That's all, no need for anger.
Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma.
" I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9
JLA brand RACK points = 514k
