Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
and wannabuyamonkey? didn't you ask for specific questions? I posted several a few days back and you haven't addressed a single one. In fact no one is really addressing those questions, there focusing too much on insulting me and my sources.



You mean these?

Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
-The Pentagon damage seems odd for a jet fuel fire, or the fact that there's no footage of the plane crashing into the pentagon.
-The testimony of firefighters who heard bombs in the WTC.
-The video of the second plane from several angles showing a spark under the fuel tank right BEFORE it hit the tower.
-The former CIA agent who says Osama hated Saddam and called him the "Socialist Infidel." Which goes against the idea of them being allies.
Or this quote from Bush (which you can find anywhere on video):
"And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, 'There's one terrible pilot.' And I said, 'It must have been a horrible accident.' But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it."
The problem with the above statement is that there was no live television coverage of the first plane strike. Only one known video exists from a french tourist and that wasn't available until 9/12. So either Bush was lying for some reason about seeing the attack on tv or he saw it on a closed circuit tv. There's no way around those options, they are conclusions based on solid FACTS.
-Or how about the question of why the FAA in summer 2001 lost track of a plane carrying Payne Stewart and managed to get fighter jets to intercept it within minutes. Yet on 9/11 there were gaps of several minutes, up to an hour, between losing contact with planes and planes going off course and planes crashing and no fighter jets were scrambled to intercept.
-Or this: The attack plane approached Washington D.C. from the northwest, but instead of diving into the portions of the Pentagon housing the top Brass like Donald Rumsfeld, the plane executed a 270 degree spiral dive to approach the vast building from the southwest side and strike a portion of Wedge 1 that was undergoing renovations. While crashing into other portions of the Pentagon would likely have killed thousands, the precision maneuver limited fatalities in the building to under 200. ( source )
-Or this question: Why did Hani Hanjour undertake a nearly impossible maneuver to strike the portion of the Pentagon that was nearly empty? How could he have executed such an extreme maneuver when he "couldn't fly at all" according to one of his flight instructors? ( source )



Mot of these aren't acctualy questions, but here gos anyway.

-The Pentagon damage seems odd for a jet fuel fire, or the fact that there's no footage of the plane crashing into the

Really? and you know what damge caused by jet fuel is suposed to look like? And IF Bush knew don't you think they would have arranged for there to be footage of the plane hitting?

-The testimony of firefighters who heard bombs in the WTC.

Human testimony can be flawed and a tower falling apart can make alot of strange sounds. Also the bodies of people hitting the pavement from miles above sounded alot like bombs too.

-The video of the second plane from several angles showing a spark under the fuel tank right BEFORE it hit the tower.

This is just stupid. Are you sugesting that the fuel wouldn't have ignighted from the crash alone. Consperacy nuts alwayse find wierd camera effects and ry to ascribe something sinister to them, but in this case it doesn't even make sense.

Quote:

-The former CIA agent who says Osama hated Saddam and called him the "Socialist Infidel." Which goes against the idea of them being allies.
Or this quote from Bush (which you can find anywhere on video):
"And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, 'There's one terrible pilot.' And I said, 'It must have been a horrible accident.' But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it."
The problem with the above statement is that there was no live television coverage of the first plane strike. Only one known video exists from a french tourist and that wasn't available until 9/12. So either Bush was lying for some reason about seeing the attack on tv or he saw it on a closed circuit tv. There's no way around those options, they are conclusions based on solid FACTS.



See you made the incredibly stupid and common mistake for consperacy nuts by saying "Those are the only options" in order to discredit you all I need to do is think of a third option, which frankly there are lots. The most obvious and probable is that he mispoke, being under alot of stress he could have been refering to hearing it on the radio and just mixed memories of the other videos shown. But I'm sure you'll claim NOW that it's impossible for Bush to make a verbal gaff.

On this note I'll stop wasting my time with these rediculous points, because as your sig says "Fuck Bush" it's clear you really want to believe these things and no amount of facts or common reasoning can convince you otherwise. As i demonstrated above.

Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k