Quote:
Jim Jackson said:
Quote:
wannabuyamonkey said:
I'm sorry, but this is just patronising and rude. Your implying that Paraih has no right to debate this because he doesn't have a Ph.D. devoting his life to prove evolution.
If we consult the lawyers for a legal opinion, then we consult the scientists for the scientific ones.
Pariah is entitled to his opinion. But time spent in study on the subject does matter. Pariah may debate it as he wishes, too.
Call me patronizing and rude if you wish, but it's a fact. We don't go to Joe Blow on the street to ask him about the law.
You conviniently left out the rest of my post, because it addresses exactly this point, if we shouldn't listen to Pariah , then we sure as hell shouldn't listen to you. If I'm going to use your example of the lawer (and you sure haven't shied away from debating legal matters with G-Man) Paraih isn't acting as a lawer, he's acting as one who recieved legal advise and is choosing to share said advise with us. To sum it up, if P has no right or authority to speak on these matters then you have no right to question his assertions because you are no more qualified than he. Infact if i were to take your assertions to the fullest then you should NEVER question P on anything regarding Catholosism. What we have here is two people who agree with two different sets of Ph.D.s For you to sidestep the acctual arguments he makes by saying (some, not all) Ph.D.s dissagree with you is no different from me dissmissing any argument you make by simply quoting "because the Bible tells me so"
Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma.
" I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9
JLA brand RACK points = 514k 
| 
