Quote: Trying to guide this back to Paul as to put him on the defensive doesn't carry much weight. Considering it was you who angrily called him a "fool" for bringing it up.
Who's the foolish one now?
Angrily? I'm amazed that you can read beond my words and devine my intentions and emotional state, but I'm sorry to tell you, I'm really not that angry and it's been a long time since politics has been a sourse for me to get angry.
OK, Paul let me try to explain this in more simple terms. If you would go back and read teh post in wich I warned Paul about the risk of looking like a fool (wich considering that you want me to read page after page of a radically biased web site, it's the least you could do). You'll notice that in context I said that he would look like a fool in trying to demonise his opposition wich he continues to do and continues to make himself look the fool. Case in point you say that I can't giude this back at Paul (Jr.), wich would be true because this story is a 100% negative to the Republican side, but Paul Jr. insisted on taking it a step further and labeling cons as liars wich he could not substanciate. If he hadn't again tried to villify the opposition my face would simply be red, but allas even in this great "victory?" he insists on looking foolish and hate filled.
Oh I better add a smily lest you read this post assuming that I was screaming with rage while typing.... I wasn't
Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma.
" I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9
JLA brand RACK points = 514k
