Quote:

Karl Hungus said:
Quote:

the G-man said:
So, by your reckoning, getting a murderer off scot free is okay, but assisting someone in exercising their free speech rights to challange legislation is bad?

Oooookay.......


Getting a murderer off is part of the legal system, part of the balances needed for it to work. "Better ten guilty men go free than 1 innocent man to be convicted" and all that.
Taking a civil case to help roll back clean air regulations so a client can get richer while polluting more is either
A. blind greed in accepting the case.
B. pure evil for thinking the client's case is a worthy cause.




So anyone who disagrees with your POV on pollution (or on this particular clean air proposal) is not just someone who's wrong, or someone who simply has a divergent view from your own.

They're "evil".


How wonderfully tolerant and open-minded of you.