Quote: Captain Sammitch said: Stepping around that little bit of trolling, I don't really see anything wrong with asserting that evolutionary processes might have been a vehicle for creation. As long as we can be sure the curriculum contains hard science and not just so much speculation, I don't think there's much room for objection to teaching a scientific theory in a science class.
Quote: Pariah said: Back.
Heinz is a moron and so is her husband. They try to buy credibility by calling themselves Christian and then use it to reason the opposing side's favorable opinion ("favorable" only to said opposing side though). They can take their stand spinning about abortion and evolution and shove it up their asses. Heinz prolly knows shit about evolution just as she knows shit about Catholicism.
Given the expected reaction by the infallible keepers of the Christian faith like Pariah, the sarcasm may have been premature but not unwarranted.
As for Pariah. Fuck you. I see you're certain that beleiving in evolution is completely incompatible with beleiving in a creator. Say hi to God for me next time he converses with you. Dickwad.
From Washington Times interview with DeLay:
Mr. Hurt: Have you ever crossed the line of ethical behavior in terms of dealing with lobbyists, your use of government authority or with fundraising?
Mr. DeLay: Ever is a very strong word.
I don't really see anything wrong with asserting that evolutionary processes might have been a vehicle for creation. As long as we can be sure the curriculum contains hard science and not just so much speculation, I don't think there's much room for objection to teaching a scientific theory in a science class. 
