Uschi, if you'd please review, the argument isn't based on the outcome of child-rape, but rather the comparative psychology of homosexuals and pedophiles and how their individual reasoning, based on their sexuality, can override any ideal thoughts that involve not acting on their urges. Plus, any arguments that have referred to adult-child interaction have involved hypothetical/past cases of children actually consenting to sexual contact and what kind of controversey this causes concerning the possible ability, in the eyes of the law, for a person under eighteen to have the right of consent. In which case, you should try refuting the arguments instead of making snap judgments like this:
Quote: Uschi said: There is no way logistics and hasty conclusions or rationalizations can ever equate rape and pedophilic molestation to healthy adult relationships no matter what genders are involved in the match-up.
