Quote: klinton said: The tissues in the rectum are not irreversibly damaged...if that were the case constipation would be the death of us all. You keep referring to it in terms such as 'blunt force' and 'unwanted'
I never said that it would be irreversibly damaged in every case (although it could be). I did, however, say that it was damaged unnecessarily and is put through more hurtful stress than the vaginal organ and retains much more potential than it for lasting damage.
Tell me something: When you commented on my "unwanted" remark, does that mean you actually look forward to pain, unintentional or otherwise.
Quote: ...and do little to address an act of love...These words are 'accredited to the sphincters' reaction by people like you...not the participants in the act.
I think I satisfactorilly(sp) addressed the issue of "love" and pleasureable sensations when I analyzed the correlations between homosexuality, pedophilia, and straight up masochism.
Quote: You're seeing it say what you want to see.
I find much irony here.
Quote: Are gay men more prone to STDs? Yes. But only because the gay community is rampant with casual sex (a situation that is not likely to improve if they cntinue to be marginalized). Can anal sex cause damage to the rectal cavity? Yes. But the severety is not something to note as a 'health risk' or a reason to refrain from the actvity....not even close. Any attempt to say otherwise is just not true. An article from 1990, and Time magazine, ia not an authority on the subject.
With all due respect Klinton, your adamant tone aside, you're not any authority on the subject yourself either.
From more than one source, I'm given the direct statement and reluctant admittance (from the author) that even monogamous anal sex, on a long enough timeline, causes lasting negative effects to the colon interior/anterior. And this isn't by uncommon accidents.
