wow.
boy, there's nothing like expressing a differing opinion in here. you guys make these discussions so fun.
Quote:
Ultimate Jaburg53 said:
Another thing, since it's almost a given that managers/valets cannot wrestle why not keep the fact that your manager can wrestle a secret? The element of surprise. It's sorta like a tactic.
i'd even agree with that... but they didn't do that. there was no story to support that. everything before and after disagreed with that.
Quote:
Nowhereman said:
When does timing mean anything in WWE?
so... why bother making sense now, right?
...isn't this the kinda stuff you're always upset about?
Quote:
Nowhereman said:
And why cant managers be good wrestlers?
i'm not saying that they can't.
i'm saying that its odd that someone who wasn't a wrestler was instantly elevated to a "take on hbk" status for one week, then demoted back again the week after.
Quote:
Nowhereman said:
Hogan does not like making other people look good........
except the rock. or brock. or hhh. or taker. or angle. and everyone else he lost to in 2002/03.
let it go, nowie.
Quote:
Nowhereman said:
Anyone who didnt suspect that Davari was a wrestler who was hiding the fact,is a fucking idiot!
yeah, he looked real tough not wrestling in that suit every week. and even tougher when his pal slapped him to the floor and made him grovel to the back the week after the ppv.
gentlemen, pretend for a moment that this wasn't hulk hogan. instead, it was one of the other wrestlers of your wanking choice. would this all of a sudden seem like a valid point?
