Quote: thedoctor said: Bruce had tossed the gun. By that time he had already made a decision. So, no, Bruce was not there to kill Falcone.
Specious logic. He was notably saving the gun for Chill. That doesn't mean he has reservations about killing others--Especially not simply because he doesn't have a gun. He was just as if not more proficient with his fists.
Specious logic. There is no evidence that Bruce knew anything about fighting at that time. A gun is a simple, ranged weapon that would allow him to kill quick and easy. A hand to hand fight would require getting up close and dealing with Falcone's guards. Check and mate.
Quote: Pariah said:
Quote: thedoctor said: As Falcone saw it, he had nothing to fear from Bruce.
That kind of reasoning could be used for many other people a mob boss like Falcone would have offed simply to gain a rep. He's a guy who commands/demands respect. And if he doesn't get it.....
... he humiliates the brat and roughs him up. You don't kill a fly with a shotgun. Bruce wasn't worth the effort, and Falcone already displayed who was the boss.
Until you actually see the movie, your critics of it mean jack. If you actually do see it, let me know and then we can actually discuss it.
whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules. It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness. This is true both in politics and on the internet."
