So, let me get this straight, the Times thinks that Batman Begins should cause people to go see other films? Because I thought that you go to see the movie you want to see, and don't see the movies you don't want see. And obviously, people want to see Batman Begins, because they are going to see that instead of the other movies in the theatre. So, that makes Batman Begins the movie everyone wants to right now.
Some people just don't want to see a small time director like Nolan succeed in the business. They would rather he stick to small, independant films. The kind of films the critics can't stop talking about, and no one wants to listen about. They are scared that if the small time director succeeds, as Nolan has with this film, then he won't make the movies that make them happy. So they blast the small time director's big hit, because they can't stand to see someone succeed in the business.
To sum it all up. They are fucktards. Ignore them, or write in.
"Well, as it happens, I wrote the damned SOP," Illescue half snarled, "and as of now, you can bar those jackals from any part of this facility until Hell's a hockey rink! Is that perfectly clear?!" - Dr. Franz Illescue - Honor Harrington: At All Costs
"I don't know what I'm do, or how I do, I just do." - Alexander Ovechkin</sub>