Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:
Quote:

magicjay38 said:
Since we all want balanced journalism, here is a broader perspective of the issue. Anyone ever hear of economic obsolescence?



So we hear from the lips of a good liberal concerned with social justice that someones rights can become economically obsolete. You heard it here folks!



WBAM, I didn't just make that up. It's a term used in real estate appraisal to describe a property that has outlived it's viable function. Don't lose sight of the fact that there were 115 homes. With the exception of less than a dozen owners, all reached settlement with the city and moved on. The city has decided to hang it's hat on Pfizer as the future of the city. It wants to provide accomadations to the company, hence a hotel, office complex is developed. I find it funny that no one noticed that the majority was comprised mostly of Republicans! Justice Stevens was appointed by that liberal Richard Nixon. Justice Kennedy was appointed by the Grand Pubah of conservatives, Ronald Reagan. Justice Souter was appointed by King George I.

I've not been to New London, CT but a Google search yeilded that the Thames Riverfront area is home to many anti-poverty services. The coincidence of names produces a question for Paul. Would you say your London is better off since the Canary Row redevelopment project? Has it been an overall benefit to the city or do you long for the delapidated wherhouses it replaced?

BTW, I consider myself more an anarchist than a liberal.