Quote:

the G-man said:
...
Seriously, however, it there is good evidence that either of these guys lied under oath, they should be prosecuted. But at the same time simply having "he said she said" discrepancies is not particularly good evidence, just because the "he" is a Republican.


Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
I agree with you on that point. Hopefully you would apply the same reasoning if it was a Democrat in a similar position.



I seem to recall at least one prominent democrat who was prosecuted for lying under oath, and was found to have lied under oath and fined by the court. Where did you stand on his prosecution?