Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:
This is a bunch of partisans saying no crime was commited after it's been established that there has been.



But it hasn't been established that a crime was committed.

The only way you can establish a crime was committed, as a matter of law, is when there has been a conviction.

There hasn't been a conviction for outing a CIA covert operative. In fact, to date, no one has even been charged with that.

In one sentence you acknowlege that taking the word only of the agency and the prosecutor would be prejudging guilt. In the other, you claim that the elements of guilt have been established.

How are you not the one acting as a partisan?


Wouldn't you say outing an agent for personal reasons is unethical and immoral, even if its not illegal?

Bow ties are coool.