Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:
Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:
The article seems more ambuguouse that you make it out to be.


did you mean "ambiguous than?"
If so, then I agree its not definitive. But it does look bad. And if the reports about the report can be substantiated then it'll be damning to Bush.



You're right, if the reposts about the rports given to some guy by the other guy who knew the guy whith the reports are substatiated by the reports about the reports about the reports, then things will look bad for Bush..... Assuming CBS didn't forge them.


no offense. and i mean this will all due respect.
you're an idiot.
Its one thing to hold conservative values, but its another thing to blindly support a member of the party just because he's in charge.
Bush has admitted he was wrong about the intel on the trailers, that's not in debate. As it stands, it seems the report exists. Even if it doesn't, then Bush went to war based on false intel.
So if the report exists, then he was flat out lying.



I'm an idiot simply because I'm not going to throw the president under the bus based on an "if"? That's the point... It's an if. So considering all the other stuff your side has tried to pull, I'm not even going to entertain it untill the the "if" is removed. This isn't blind partisanship on my part. It's the fact that your side has thrown out so many accusations that didn't stick, I'm not going to flinch over an "if" and if you evepect me to, then with all due respect, you're an idiot.

Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k