Quote:

the G-man said:
Beyond the whole "innocent until proven guilty" concept, there is the fact that, for a grand jury to charge someone, there need only be a "probable cause" or a reasonable basis to believe that person committed a crime.

In the case at hand, the grand jury apparently found there was not even a reasonable basis to believe that Rove committed a crime. Therefore, yes, he is technically "innocent."


look you can say "see? he wasn't charged" but you can't sit there like an ass and proclaim "he was innocent all along, bring on the oiled boys"

Bow ties are coool.