I must not be a member of that group "the angry left". Sure I'm skeptical of Rove having a faulty memory & the almost half dozen times he went before the Grand Jury to amend & clarify earlier statements. Rove probably did lie when earlier questioned. Yet I'm fine with perjury not being decided on a "probably". Considering Fitzgerald has demonstrated that he's a tough but fair prosecutor, we're left with a "probably". That is a good thing. Perjury is & should be a hard thing to prove.

BTW I'm guessing PaulWellr didn't change the title of this thread but perhaps a mod?

Fair play!