Quote:

r3x29yz4a said:
Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:
I still wonder why you guys are so willing to bend over backwords grasping at straws for this "leak" case, but don't seem at all concerned w/ the New York Times leak case.


me personally, it goes towards power. I want my newspapers to give me information on what the government is doing. i don't want elected leaders using their information to attack people who disagree with them.
besides, bush said after 9/11 they'd be tracking money and bank transfers so any smart terrorist/criminal would've thought of that.



Right wich is exactly why there was no need for the Times to publish teh details to assist terrorists in hiding thier money. As you statted we all knew the gov. was doing it so it wasn't in the public intrest to disclose details. Also who do you want making policy decicisions in regard to the national security, elected officials or unelected newspaper editors?

Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k