I don't know if he is innocent or not.

However, you are focusing on a relatively minor point in my response.

I had indicated to you that there was little actual evidence that Libby, if guily, was lying to protect Cheney. I explained, in response to a post of yours, that it seemed more plausible that Libby had lied, if at all, to save his own skin, which is the more typical scenario in a perjury case.

Again, I have to ask: do you really read what we post?