As noted above, I think a pardon is a bad idea, especially unless and until the appeals process is played out. So I assume you aren't referring to me.

And, since I assume you aren't referring to me, why are you dodging my question, which was about what you would do the conviction was overturned? How is noting that the conviction could be overturned in any way showing irreverence to the rule of law?

Furthermore, far as a double standard, since most of the people calling for a pardon are people who, right or wrong, honestly believe that Libby was treated unfairly--including at least two of his jurors--where's the double standard?