Nope, you doing your usual schtick.
Here's what I said via Berger...
Quote:

#811763 Re: Sandy Berger - Mon Jan 15 2007 11:15 PM
OK, I obviously need to say more about Berger. He isn't above the law, he deserved the punishment he got for breaking the law. Considering the findings of the Justice Department I wouldn't have a problem with Berger taking a job with another administration. To be specific, it couldn't be anything of high rank. It's an unwritten rule for either party that the top spots don't go for people to have records no matter the circumstances. I agree with that standard. If there is any evidence that he did more than what the Justice Department found then I would say no future job & that he wasn't punished enough.




and what I thought I remembered than now googled...

Quote:

Elliott Abrams, an assistant secretary of state under Reagan, pleaded guilty in 1991 to two counts of withholding evidence from Congress (i.e., lying) over his role in the Iran-Contra affair. Bush I pardoned him; Bush II has appointed him to the National SecurityCouncil as director of its office for democracy, human rights and international operations. The post requires no Senate approval.



FAIR.org

Btw are you still unsure of Libby's guilt G-man?

Fair play!