Quote:

theory9 said:
Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:


ou thinking that doesn't make it true. For one to ASSUME there is no God when the existence of God has never been demonstrated false would be highly un-scientific.



The burden of proof rests with you--if you believe God exists, then it is up to you (and others) to prove it.


The burdon of proof depends on the thesis. If I said "A" is true because God exists then the burdon would be mine, but if someone says "A" is true because there is no God then the burdon of proof lies with proving he doesn't exist. Understand?

Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k