Quote: ManofTheAtom said: When did I say I like Liefeld? All I said was that compared to Moore his version of Supreme was more original.
As I recall you bought that comic when Lefield was doing it. Why would you buy it if you don't like Lefield, especially if you have the power of telling if a comic is good or bad by looking at the cover?
Quote: You're just lost in the fanboy absolutes that say that it's impossible for someone to like AND dislike the different things one single creator does.
One can like Watchmen and not Supreme, you did know that, right? (just to pick two examples).
Did I say "I'll read Supreme and I'll like it" or "I'll read Supreme and I'll like it if it's good"? Go back and check, then fuck off.
Quote: And one doesn't have to buy something to "bitch" about it, we are all free to have an opinion on whatever the fuck we want to.
We're free to bitch, but not to the extent you do. You talk about the quality of the story without having read it; you can freely talk about the quality of the concepts used, which is what you seem to dislike, but you CAN'T talk about the story unless you've READ it. Stories are READ. You place your eyes on the words and decypher the information. Without that, you don't know shit.
Quote: My opinion is that what some fanboys think is the "best Superman in 20 years" is just a lame rip off of the SA Superman and that by itself makes it a bad thing.
You can disagree with the principle of the story (I disagree with the principle of GL: Rebirth because I don't agree with Jordan being brought back like that), but you can't bitch about the story itself (I've never said Rebirth is poorly written because I haven't read it).
Quote: It's sad that your entire opinion on a creator's work is based on who they are as a person instead of the ACTUAL WORK ITSELF.
