I've never met anyone who'd like for the Byrne era to be back.

Personally I want things to keep moving forward in comics, not backwards.

As for Supreme, thank you for proving me right when I said that you're incapable of accepting that Moore's version of Supreme is a rip off of the Silver Age Superman.

That's all you have to do yet it's very hard for you to accept.

Just in case you ever want to stop being a fanboy and develop an informed opinion, you can check the differences between Liefeld's Supreme and Moore's Supreme in the following pages.

I bet even then you'll be hard pressed to accept that Moore used Superman as his guidelines for Supreme while Liefeld's version was more original (in spite of being labeled a Superman copy by his creator).

Only a fanboy would think that physical apperance makes a character a copy of another one while the actual story and personality have no bearing on who a character is.

http://www.weirdspace.dk/Rob%20Liefeld/Ethan%20Crane%20version%202.htm

http://www.weirdspace.dk/Rob%20Liefeld/Ethan%20Crane%20version%201.htm

Last edited by ManofTheAtom; 2005-07-25 12:18 AM.
Comics are like a Rorschach test; everyone has a different opinion on what they are and can be...