Quote:

Chris Oakley said:
Quote:

thedoctor said:
More of that masterful use of psychology. A complete and utter transferral of aggression and blame from oneself to others means that whoever is doing this has done a lot of research. Though I'm not sure if it's a sign of ill-preparation or yet another masterful manipulation to further the art of the mentally deficient psychopath, shouldn't he use the word libel instead of slander because it's in print?



Research nothing...what I'm saying is nothing less than the absolute truth.

And incidentally, if you want a further example of the unbelievable naievete I have to put up with in dealing with those who don't get why I have to keep defending myself, check out this little commentary someone posted to me at Intrepid Media back in February:

Quote:

Chris, buddy, you're in control of this whole situation more than you think.

But it's time you start thinking that way, otherwise it will ruin you. The preoccupation you have with certain hurts is exactly what I'm talking about in the column - you're only a victim because you allow others to put you in that position, especially those who delight in doing it.

Coming on here and blasting us, when you don't know us and we've done nothing to you, is not the answer. Most everyone has first responded to you with some form of concern or sympathy. Use that to build yourself up in a positive manner.

Otherwise, we'll just be added to your "list", and it doesn't sound like that needs to get any longer than it is."





Posting a rational, well-though out spiel as naive. Whoever is controlling this alt is a posting God.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."