Quote: r3x29yz4a said: I really think that if tried to make sense for a minute, it might work. The point isn't shrouds, its assuming someone is more likely to be a criminal because they're garbed in ethnic clothing.
Please remain in context. I was saying that we should narrow down suspects based on race depending on the crime. The terrorist crimes performed in the United States, so far, have all been made by Arabs and in conjunction with threats alligned with the proposed objectives of Allah and Islam. Profiling that race would entail following their traditional clothing habits as well--Which is why I posed that certain pic. Anytime we've seen this type of garb on video, it involved someone executing an infidel. No one has needed to wear that to speak straight to anyone. And in the end, we're 95% sure that particular terorrist, who's wearing very terrorist-like clothing, would be Arab.
you seem to operate from the stance that Allah and the teachings of Islam are inherently violent. Most muslims (and certainly all the ones I've known personally) abhor violence. It's the same as how abortion clinic bombers and neo-nazis and IRA members don't accurately represent the majority of christians. By your belief, then anyone wearing a cross should also be stopped and searched and considered dangerous because some christians are terrorists.
Quote: Jim Jackson said: At least I'm outta high school and have gotten laid. And by a woman, no less.
I've been out of highschool for 4 years. And I don't need sex to feel proud of myself. My unwitting ability to bring out your insecurities accomplishes that just fine.
I'm actually impressed by the fact you got out of high school at 11.
