To answer your question: I'm not entirely sure. I can interpret it as being able to account for them and keeping the citizenry from less chaos outside by keeping them inside. However, it's hard for me to agree with the logic. There's danger being in a compacted group of hungry people just as there's danger being a in a wave of hungry people moving out of a city through twenty-five feet of water. Weighing the volume of danger between the two is difficult. On one hand: I kind of believe that them being kept in the superdome borderline violates their civil rights (if they're being kept there), and with their raising ire, more and more danger of riot is created. On the other hand: If all of those people were to leave the dome simply because they don't like to be in one place, then there will most definitely be a raise in casualties, but that fact alone doesn't alleviate the possible other danger in the dome that could very well be ten times worse--But we don't know if it will really happen or not.
It's a confusing situation, which I have not yet formed a full opinion on. And I find the fact that you have rather apalling and shows to me (even moreso) that you are neither objective nor appreciative of those peoples' situation.
