Quote:
she didn't go and march
Yes she did.
Quote:
she didn't rally a cause.
Yes she did.
See, the general problem with debating you isn't that your ideas are wrong, it's that we can't even get to the point of discussing your ideas because they're based on a total ignorance of the facts (ooh, I used the term ignorant, you'd better tell be what an uncompassionate Christian I am). We could have a debate as to wether Rosa Parks was right or wrong to do what she did. We could debate wether she was too pasive in her prostests, but we can't debate it with you because as with most debates you come with a radical point of view based on a series of facts seemingly created in your own head.
You base your opinion on the fact that Rosa Parks never went and marched:
 
And the "fact" that she never rallied a cause:
 Quote:
  
You exclaim that when she refused to sit at the back it was for no other reason but the fact that she was "old" Well here are some photos of the "elderly woman on the day of her arrest.
 
I should note that this "old" woman was in her early 20s.
Even your comparrison displays an ignorance of the facts you compare her to the real heroes by comparring her to those getting attacked by dogs or fire hoses. Those people didn't spray them selves with fire hose any more than she chose to get arrested.
The point is you have no idea what your talking about. You heard a joke while watching Barber Shop and now you think you're qualified to condemn a major catalist in teh civil rights movement dispite a complete and utter lack of facts.
At least now your friends on teh left know how we feel when debating you.
Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma.
" I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9
JLA brand RACK points = 514k 
| 
