Quote: Pariah said: So, in the end, you've just proven that "human flaw" is a subjective term. You can nitpick flaws out of anything if you try hard enough. And even then, those "flaws" would only be "flaws" according to certain people.
The burden of proof for addressing how intelligent design explains the things I've mentioned and that r3x has mentioned falls on those who support ID theory.
i happen to believe in evolution, but pariah has a point here. and the burden of proof would, again, be turned back to evolution, just the same.
evolution is supposed to be every bit the aim for perfection that you're claiming divine creation would have to be.
if we're the process of evolution, then why do we have:
Quote: Jim Jackson said: Appndices.
Adnoids.
Male pattern baldness.
one theory makes just as much sense as the other, and every answer has its own earth-2 parallel answer with which ever theory you didn't select.
