i'm never clear on why a man cheating on his wife and then lying about it is somehow a justification for a man stealing millions from indian tribes and getting favors from political cronies.
If you had bothered to read what I posted, Clinton wasn't convicted of "cheating on his wife".
Clinton was charged with perjury and obstruction of justice. Clinton lied to a grand jury in his deposition. And also obstructed a 40-million-dollar investigation.
In the Paula Jones case, several U.S. District Courts and the Supreme Court found her case substantial enough to recognize and uphold.
In the cases of Whitewater, Vince Foster, Filegate, etc, I believe Clinton was guilty of even more crimes, that simply could not be proven with supporting evidence.
In addition, I listed several other cases involving Democrats, demonstrating Democrats are just as vulnerable to the label "culture of corruption" as the Republicans they've slapped the label on.
If you'd bothered to read them.
As G-man and others have pointed out, Democrats are a substantial part of the "culture of corruption" in the Abramoff scandal as well.
