Quote:

...Well, In many cases schools teach that abstinace is futile and encourage kids to experience as long as they're safe.


Covering the various forms of birth control isn't encouraging kids. I know of no schools that don't present abstinence as anything but the only 100% way of not becoming pregnant or avoiding STD's. Unless your homeschooling, you can either have teachers talk about birth control or your kids can just learn from other kids.

Quote:

First you require me to pay for the school that goes beyond educating my child about the facts and teaching them morals as you see them, then you force my child, if I have one, to attend the school (education is comulsory in most states) so why wouldn't many parrents want to put thier children in a school that reinforced thier world-view rather than undermined it? I can assure you that if the atmosphere in public schools wasn't becoming more hostile towards specific religions then the adherants to said religions wouldn't feel as compelled to seek alternitives, of coarse anotehr way to solve the problem would be to simply eliminate any alternitives... wich seems to be the prefered direction for some.


As said earlier, most of us pay for public schooling. Even though I don't have children, it is still to my benefit to have a strong educational system as it allows our nation to stay on top. I'm looking at your response & see somebody who I doubt would ever support any funding towards public schooling unless his kids had to use it. Not a good way to convince people that vouchers are the best thing for the country.

Fair play!