|
1. You do not talk about snarf. 7500+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,462 |
Quote:
rufusTfirefly said:
Nothing like working out a huge log while trying to follow the history of Kang the Conqueror.
Now you're talking!
I much prefer the Marvel books, purely for the obssessively researched character history.
S'funny, whilst reading the 'Werewolf by night' bio in the Horror book, interesting as it was, I knew it would be much more fun reading it then to actually read the actual comic appearences of Werewolf.
Again, agreed with the others - the only drawback is that Marvel hasn't commisioned new art for the main profile pic - they used to! This was the biggest travesty I felt with Marvel Encyclopedia HArd covers - no new art!
I don't much care for the Power charts - they seem to inconsistent and surely 10 would be a better number than seven!
Having said that, I am disappointed by the Powers description, it's not detailed enough - made so apparent by the recent Ultimate handbook, nothing much was revealed about these new characters!
DCs profiles are laughable.
Me No Rikey Rob, he's a banana queer!
I shit on Hogan!
|