Quote:
Wednesday said:
Quote:
wannabuyamonkey said:
Quote:
Wednesday said:
And how is that any more "centric" than adding Creationism to a curriculum? One removes material to cater to the religious whims of a few, the other adds.
I think you point out the crucial difference and you don't even realise it. If you don't see the difference between inclusion and exclusion, then we have a problem. Is allowing blacks to vote afro-centric? no...
That's...what I'm saying. Such a move isn't necessarily centric.
Thanks.
Quote:
wannabuyamonkey said:
...but to deny any group the vote would be wrong.
That's incorrect. We deny people under the age of 18 the ability to vote in general election for a reason.
There are good reasons to exclude.
I meant racially, wich should have been apperant from teh context, but if you're going to ignore the greater context of what I'm saying just to avoid the point, then this conversation is getting old quick. Yes there are cases were exclusion is right, but my point is there is a fundamental difference between inclusion and exclusion. Will you grant that to allow the qutioning of an idea is fudamentally differant than banning it?
Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma.
" I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9
JLA brand RACK points = 514k 
| 
