annie's comments were the exact opposite of all the critiques i've read and discussed, thats all i meant.
as for nintendo's titles being of a smaller range than sony's, it really isn't accurate. zelda, mario, smash bros, kirby, karts, metroid, star fox, donkey kong, luigi's mansion, etc, etc.... those are all nintendo games. they're not gamecube's (or wii's or snes') only games, nor are they the only ones that receive acclaim.
technically, in the case of this argument, sony doesn't have any games. they rely on the same third parties nintendo does. and looking at each of those third parties individually, nothing is all that impressive.
ea only really has madden. capcom only has resident evil. rockstar only has grand theft auto. konami only has metal gear, etc, etc.
does ps2 have more games than gamecube? yes. will ps3 have more games than wii? more than likely.
but in terms of quantity and quality or originality of games, no game maker even comes close to nintendo.
