|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,920
devil-lovin' Bat-Man 15000+ posts
|
devil-lovin' Bat-Man 15000+ posts
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,920 |
Quote:
the G-man said: What character traits did he change in Superman and, if so, were those traits important to the character?
He completely turned Superman around. Pre-Crisis, Clark Kent was a goofy identity made up by Superman. Post-Crisis, Superman was the identity created by Clark. The self-confidence was the act, not the shyness.
As mentioned, Luthor was also completely reworked. Pre-Crisis Luthor hated Superman because he made him bald. Post-Crisis Luthor hated Superman for ridiculing him in front of the city and replacing him as its "saviour".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 47,824 Likes: 6
Hip To Be Square 15000+ posts
|
Hip To Be Square 15000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 47,824 Likes: 6 |
On top of everything, if killing the Phantom Zone criminals was not a huge change in Supermans character, I dont know what was!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,746
2500+ posts
|
2500+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,746 |
Quote:
Nowhereman said: On top of everything, if killing the Phantom Zone criminals was not a huge change in Supermans character, I dont know what was!
The killing of the Phantom Zone villains is the worst thing that Byrne did. Byrne claimed he did it so that Superman would formulate a code of ethics against killing. Pre-reboot, the code had been installed in Superman during his upbringing by Ma and Pa Kent, in Byrne's version, we're led to believe that Ma and Pa never taught Clark that killing is bad. Shouldn't that be considered a drastic change to his character right there?
Get the fuck out!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734 Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you) 50000+ posts
|
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you) 50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734 Likes: 2 |
unless you irrgaydiated anyone can see that....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546 Likes: 1
living in 1962 15000+ posts
|
living in 1962 15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546 Likes: 1 |
Is Superman making a porno with Big Barda "gutting the mythos"?
reminds me of Byrne's bitching about KC and the rumors of Supes and WW having a kid out of wedlock.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951 Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit" 15000+ posts
|
Officially "too old for this shit" 15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951 Likes: 6 |
Again, while I think the "Big Barda" story was simply terrible on any number of levels, since it was a "mind controlled" Superman, I don't see how that "guts the mythos" any more than the dozens of stories over the years depicting a "mind controlled" Superman who does any number of unsavory or villainous acts.
Interestingly enough, the best support for a charge against Byrne that he damaged the mythos or was not true to the character is the fact he made Clark into something of a jock as opposed the "silver age bumbler" which, ironically, is a change that many of you seem to applaud.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392
[insert non-dated reference here] 10000+ posts
|
[insert non-dated reference here] 10000+ posts
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,392 |
All of which does nothing to alter the fact that Byrne is being hypocritical in his criticisms of the film.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,920
devil-lovin' Bat-Man 15000+ posts
|
devil-lovin' Bat-Man 15000+ posts
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,920 |
Byrne also had an amnesiac Superman take a suggestive naked bath with Amazing Grace, implying that they had sex. He sure liked creating situations where Superman did "immoral" things... I remember another issue where he lost control of his powers and accidentally used his x-ray vision on not only Cat Grant, but her underage son!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734 Likes: 2
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you) 50000+ posts
|
Educator to comprehension impaired (JLA, that is you) 50000+ posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 53,734 Likes: 2 |
and now the reason g-man likes byrne is revealed!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,030
6000+ posts
|
OP
6000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,030 |
Quote:
the G-man said: Interestingly enough, the best support for a charge against Byrne that he damaged the mythos or was not true to the character is the fact he made Clark into something of a jock as opposed the "silver age bumbler" which, ironically, is a change that many of you seem to applaud.
I don't applaud it.
We all wear a green carnation.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,813
I Am Groot 5000+ posts
|
I Am Groot 5000+ posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,813 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951 Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit" 15000+ posts
|
Officially "too old for this shit" 15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,951 Likes: 6 |
I would assume for the same reason I wouldn't. A lot of us think the "Clark/Superman dichotomy" is the heart and soul of the character. Without that, he's just a generic superhero with funny red underoos on the outside of his costume.
|
|
|
|
|