Quote: Matter-eater Man said: I guess the difference between us was I was pressing for a less fictionalized Path. If the network had advertised it as a dramitization to begin with I wouldn't have had much objection to it other than that it was in bad taste like the Reagens.
I agree. If you're going to tell this story, make it accurate. From the bit I watched tonight it seems-counter to the 9/11 commission testimony-that Bush wanted to respond swiftly to the "Bin Laden determined to attack U.S." but was thwarted by the CIA. Also, they mention Clinton's blow jobs but not the fact that Bush took a record number of vacation days in the 7 months between being sworn in and 9/11.
So your problem isn't so much a matter of teh facts presented, but rather that certain facts were ommited?
just the facts, maam.
i'm too much of a buff of true crime and investigations stories to have any tolerance for lies about murders.
